Conflict of Interest Policy

Journal of Engineering Research and Reviews is committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and objectivity in scientific research and publication. This Conflict of Interest Policy is designed to articulate our dedication to identifying, managing, and mitigating conflicts of interest to ensure the credibility and reliability of the content we publish.

1. Definition of Conflict of Interest

A conflict of interest arises when the personal, financial, or professional interests of individuals involved in the publication process may compromise the objectivity, integrity, or impartiality of the research and its subsequent dissemination. Conflicts of interest may be real or perceived and can involve authors, editors, reviewers, or any other party contributing to the publication process.

2. Author Responsibilities

2.1. Disclosure

Authors submitting manuscripts to the Journal of Engineering Research and Reviews are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the research, interpretation, or presentation of their work. This includes but is not limited to financial interests, affiliations, or relationships with organizations that may have a direct or indirect interest in the submitted content.

2.2. Transparency in Funding

Authors must provide transparent information about funding sources for their research. Full disclosure of financial support, grants, or any other financial relationships that may have influenced the research is essential. This transparency ensures that readers and reviewers can assess the potential impact of funding sources on the study.

2.3. Mitigation Strategies

In cases where conflicts of interest exist, authors are encouraged to propose mitigation strategies to address and manage these conflicts. These strategies may include clear disclosure statements within the manuscript, acknowledgment of potential biases, or other measures to ensure transparency.

3. Editor Responsibilities

3.1. Evaluation of Manuscripts

Editors at the Journal of Engineering Research and Reviews are responsible for evaluating submitted manuscripts objectively and without bias. Editors should recuse themselves from handling a manuscript if they have a personal, financial, or professional relationship with the authors that may compromise their impartiality.

3.2. Fair and Impartial Decision-Making

Editors must make editorial decisions based solely on the scientific merit of the manuscript, regardless of the authors' affiliations or potential conflicts of interest. If conflicts are identified during the review process, editors should take appropriate actions, including seeking additional reviews or consulting with other members of the editorial board.

3.3. Transparency in Editorial Decisions

In cases where conflicts of interest among editors exist, transparency in the decision-making process is paramount. Editors should openly communicate any potential conflicts and take steps to mitigate their impact, ensuring that the publication process remains fair and unbiased.

4. Reviewer Responsibilities

4.1. Impartial Evaluation

Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the peer-review process. They are expected to conduct evaluations objectively, without personal, financial, or professional biases that could influence their assessment of the manuscript.

4.2. Disclosure of Conflicts

Reviewers must promptly disclose any conflicts of interest to the editorial team. If a potential conflict is identified after accepting a review assignment, reviewers should immediately inform the editor, allowing for appropriate actions, such as reassignment of the review.

4.3. Confidentiality and Integrity

Reviewers are expected to treat the review process with confidentiality and integrity. Any information obtained during the review process should be handled responsibly, and reviewers should refrain from using unpublished information for personal gain or biased decision-making.

5. Publisher Responsibilities

5.1. Transparency in Operations

The publisher of the Journal of Engineering Research and Reviews is committed to maintaining transparency in its operations. Any potential conflicts of interest involving the publisher, editorial team, or any other stakeholders that may impact the publication process will be disclosed promptly.

5.2. Safeguarding Independence

The publisher ensures that editorial decisions are made independently of any external influences, financial or otherwise. The editorial team is empowered to make decisions solely based on the quality and relevance of the research.

6. Conflict Resolution

6.1. Resolution Process

In instances where conflicts of interest are identified, the Journal of Engineering Research and Reviews has established a conflict resolution process. This process involves a thorough investigation, consultation with relevant parties, and the implementation of appropriate measures to address and resolve the conflict.

6.2. Editorial Board Involvement

The editorial board plays a pivotal role in conflict resolution. If conflicts arise at any stage of the publication process, the editorial board, in consultation with relevant stakeholders, will actively work towards fair and impartial resolution.

7. Periodic Review

The Conflict of Interest Policy undergoes periodic reviews to ensure its effectiveness and relevance. Updates and modifications are made as needed to address emerging challenges and align with evolving best practices in the field of scientific publishing.